Header image

G20-O3 Regional Policy, Cohesion Policy, Financial Instruments and Policy Assessment

Tracks
Ordinary Session
Thursday, August 28, 2025
16:30 - 18:30
G5

Details

Chair: Tomas Vyrost


Speaker

Agenda Item Image
Dr. Marcela Guachamìn
Assistant Professor
Universidad Escuela Politécnica Nacional Del Ecuador

Dynamics of Financial Stress Index in Dollarized Economies: A Nonlinear Approach TVAR models

Author(s) - Presenters are indicated with (p)

Marcela Guachamìn (p)

Discussant for this paper

Zeynep Elburz

Abstract

This research develops a Financial Stress Index (FSI) for the dollarized economies of Ecuador, El Salvador and Panama using a Dynamic Factor Model (DFM) to reduce the dimension of a set of variables to a smaller group of latent dynamic factors and to capture the common movements. The FSI identified periods of high financial stress over time such as the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) of 2008 and the health crisis due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We applied a TVAR model to analyze the impact of a shock to the FSI on the real sector. The results showed that a change in the financial conditions impacts the GDP growth, indebtedness and inflation to a greater extent in the high financial stress regime compared to periods of low financial stress. Thus, the FSI is a useful tool for monitoring financial stability and could ultimately help in macroprudential policy decision-making.
Agenda Item Image
Dr. Zeynep Elburz
Assistant Professor
IZTECH

Assessing Effectiveness of Impact Measurement Tools within the Social Economy

Author(s) - Presenters are indicated with (p)

Zeynep Elburz (p), Özge Ekinci

Discussant for this paper

Gábor Bodnár

Abstract

Impact assessment; Social Return on Investment (SROI); Cost-benefit analysis; Social economy organizations
Agenda Item Image
Dr. Gábor Bodnár
Associate Professor
University of Szeged

Examining the impact of economic structural change on regional differences in Central Eastern Europe

Author(s) - Presenters are indicated with (p)

Marianna Sávai (p), Gábor Bodnár (p)

Discussant for this paper

Mei-se Chien

Abstract

In the years following the 1989–1990 regime change, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) were confronted with a series of economic and political challenges. In addition to the pervasive influence of privatisation, the 1990s were a period of significant transition. By the turn of the millennium, the CEEs had reached their pre-transition levels of production, while the structure of the labour market and economic sectors had undergone significant transformation. The objective of this paper is to provide an account of the structural changes that have occurred in the economies of the CEE regions (in this study, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia) from the 2000s to the advent of the global pandemic. The present study examines NUTS-3 level regions to provide a more detailed analysis of regional catching-up processes, which have so far been explored in research using more aggregated data. In light of the above, the research question that guides our investigation is as follows: what are the differences and similarities in the processes describing productivity change in NUTS-3 regions? While the majority of existing research compares catching-up processes with the EU average, our analysis compares countries with the group average, thereby offering a novel perspective on the catching-up issue. The results demonstrate that the productivity data for the regions of Central and Eastern Europe exhibit a notable economic growth in the metropolitan centres, including Bratislava, Prague and Warsaw. However, the development of rural and less developed areas in this sense still lags behind that of metropolitan areas. The more developed regions are characterised by the development of higher value-added sectors, while the less developed regions are dominated by the modernisation of the agricultural and industrial sectors. Inequalities between countries continue to widen as the more developed regions have adapted more rapidly to sectoral structural changing. In addition to the impact ratio analysis, a simulated Theil-index calculation is used to check the robustness of the results.
Agenda Item Image
Prof. Mei-se Chien
Full Professor
National Kaohsiung University Of Science And Technology

How economic policy uncertainty and financial development impact CO2 emissions?

Author(s) - Presenters are indicated with (p)

Mei-se Chien (p)

Discussant for this paper

Tomáš Výrost

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of economic policy uncertainty and financial development on CO2 emissions. The methodology employs panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bound testing and impulse response analysis for estimation, using panel data from 2000 to 2020 for 109 countries, including 30 developed countries and 79 developing countries. The empirical results can be summarized as follows:
First, the ARDL long-term relationship estimation for the full sample shows: (1) Financial institution development, financial market development, and overall financial development all increase CO2 emissions. Compared to financial institution development, financial market development has a smaller effect on increasing CO2 emissions. (2) The negative impact of World Uncertainty Index (WUI) on CO2 emissions, indicating that higher economic policy uncertainty reduces CO2 emissions. Additionally, the higher interaction effect between WUI and overall financial development increases CO2 emissions, but the interaction effects of financial institutions and financial markets with WUI show no significant impact.
Second, the ARDL long-term relationships for developed and developing country groups show: (1) In both developed and developing countries, financial institutions, financial markets, or overall financial development increase CO2 emissions, with this effect being greater in developed countries. (2) An increase in the World Uncertainty Index (WUI) reduces CO2 emissions in developing countries but has no significant effect in developed countries.
Finally, impulse response analysis shows that in developed countries, changes in both financial markets (FM) and financial institutions (FI) have significant positive impacts on CO2 emissions within two years, while in developing countries, only financial markets (FM) have a significant positive impact on CO2 emissions in the third year. Furthermore, regardless of whether countries are developed or developing, the impact of the World Uncertainty Index on CO2 emissions is insignificant.
Agenda Item Image
Prof. Tomáš Výrost
Associate Professor
Slovak Academy of Sciences

EU Cohesion Funds and Slovak Enterprises: Insights from Programming Period 2014-2020

Author(s) - Presenters are indicated with (p)

Tomáš Výrost (p), Eva Výrostová

Discussant for this paper

Marcela Guachamìn

Abstract

The main objective of the European Union (EU) Cohesion policy (CP) is to strengthen economic, social, and territorial cohesion by reducing regional disparities. Brexit, the new challenges facing the EU, and the socio-economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic created pressures, particularly on the effectiveness and efficiency of its resources.

By far, most studies find a conditional impact of CP on growth and convergence, where the effectiveness of CP depends on various factors, such as quality of institutional set-up, decentralized administrative structure, other supportive policies on national and regional levels, sound macroeconomic policies, industrial structure, territorial capital and regional characteristics, human capital, and others.

Newer studies in the field point out that an analysis should also be conducted at the micro level. The microeconomic analysis may be conducted from two different perspectives. On one hand, the national or supranational financing and management bodies may be interested in the effectiveness of the use of provided funds, reaching project goals, and their alignment, transmission channels, and contribution with respect to the overall CP objectives. From the individual company's perspective, a direct (beneficiary) or indirect involvement in CP projects (as a subcontractor or supplier) may present a substantial source of income and revenue that would be unavailable. As the provision of EU funding bypasses the usual market allocation mechanism that, in classical and neoclassical theories, ensures efficient use of scarce resources, it may be viewed as a source of unfair advantage and potential misallocation. To consider such effects, we evaluate the consequences of EU Cohesion policy funds in Slovakia from the perspective of corporate efficiency, performance, and financial standing of companies directly or indirectly involved in EU Cohesion policy-funded projects.

In our paper, we present an analysis of the Cohesion policy and its effects during the 2014-2020 programming period in Slovakia. Our analysis is augmented by using granular microeconomic data on Slovak enterprises engaged in EU Cohesion policy-funded projects by utilizing a unique dataset on financials and ownership structures spanning all Slovak legal entities in the given period.


Co-Presenter

Agenda Item Image
Gábor Bodnár
Associate Professor
University of Szeged

Agenda Item Image
Marianna Sávai
Assistant Professor
University Of Szeged

loading